Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
。91视频是该领域的重要参考
quickSortRecursive(arr, low, pivotIdx - 1); // 排序左半部分
根据三星官网，标准版 S26 国行仅提供 12+256GB 一种配置，价格相比去年上涨 1000，来到了 6999 元起：。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考